<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Foundations of Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foundationstech.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foundationstech.com</link>
	<description>Technology. Business. Networking.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A UTM Comparison by Strategies for Securing SMB Networks &#187; Untangle Calyptix Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/a-utm-comparison#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategies for Securing SMB Networks &#187; Untangle Calyptix Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=51#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/a-utm-comparison [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/a-utm-comparison" rel="nofollow">http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/a-utm-comparison</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exclusive: AccessEnforcer GUI Update Preview by Foundations of Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A UTM Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/business/exclusive-accessenforcer-gui-update-preview#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Foundations of Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A UTM Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=37#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] team at Calyptix to provide security to my clients. With the features in the next release, and the GUI enhancement, and the general improvements being made daily to the box I’m going to be very excited what the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] team at Calyptix to provide security to my clients. With the features in the next release, and the GUI enhancement, and the general improvements being made daily to the box I’m going to be very excited what the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just an Observation by Foundations of Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A UTM Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/just-an-observation#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Foundations of Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A UTM Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=45#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] Neither test specifies exactly how the boxes were configured (as I noted in a previous post, the SonicWALL’s GAV seems dependant on blocking packers for full effectiveness), and both completely leave their own product out of the mix. If you are going to perform that sort [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neither test specifies exactly how the boxes were configured (as I noted in a previous post, the SonicWALL’s GAV seems dependant on blocking packers for full effectiveness), and both completely leave their own product out of the mix. If you are going to perform that sort [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the name of your Vendor isn’t important… by Foundations of Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A UTM Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/why-the-name-of-your-vendor-isn%e2%80%99t-important%e2%80%a6#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Foundations of Technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A UTM Comparison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/why-the-name-of-your-vendor-isn%e2%80%99t-important%e2%80%a6#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] In the end I selected the Calyptix AccessEnforcer as my vendor for my company, but not after a long exhaustive search, lots of reading, lots of comparisons and plenty of hours on the phone with sales representatives. If you are interested in reading more of the final parts of why I chose Calyptix as my vendor you can read about it in this post here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the end I selected the Calyptix AccessEnforcer as my vendor for my company, but not after a long exhaustive search, lots of reading, lots of comparisons and plenty of hours on the phone with sales representatives. If you are interested in reading more of the final parts of why I chose Calyptix as my vendor you can read about it in this post here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working Together To Solve Problems by Isaac Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/working-together-to-solve-problems#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=26#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Scott et al., 
We have the ability to do Single Sign On from Central Desktop to other apps.  Its a highly secure token based system that would allow a user to have a single-sign-on experience from CD to another app and vice-versa.  We currently have this with Salesforce and Fogbugz and a few other proprietary apps (as well as integration with MSFT Identity Server). 

Its all possible - and not very expensive. 

If there are any AutoTask folks out there....we'd be interested in talking.  We really don't compete.

Isaac Garcia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott et al.,<br />
We have the ability to do Single Sign On from Central Desktop to other apps.  Its a highly secure token based system that would allow a user to have a single-sign-on experience from CD to another app and vice-versa.  We currently have this with Salesforce and Fogbugz and a few other proprietary apps (as well as integration with MSFT Identity Server). </p>
<p>Its all possible - and not very expensive. </p>
<p>If there are any AutoTask folks out there&#8230;.we&#8217;d be interested in talking.  We really don&#8217;t compete.</p>
<p>Isaac Garcia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working Together To Solve Problems by Scott Cover</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/working-together-to-solve-problems#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=26#comment-29</guid>
		<description>So far they haven't really been integrated. Still working on a few bugs in how we operate the relationship as far as reporting work. The company doing the work has their own ticketing system, we have ours, they bill us for the work, kinda a crazy situation really.

Once our Central Desktop setup is finalized (still tweaking how we input and share data), I would definitely love to see direct links from Autotask to Central Desktop.

It's really cool to see vendors actually out keeping an eye on blogs though. Makes us little guys feel important. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far they haven&#8217;t really been integrated. Still working on a few bugs in how we operate the relationship as far as reporting work. The company doing the work has their own ticketing system, we have ours, they bill us for the work, kinda a crazy situation really.</p>
<p>Once our Central Desktop setup is finalized (still tweaking how we input and share data), I would definitely love to see direct links from Autotask to Central Desktop.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really cool to see vendors actually out keeping an eye on blogs though. Makes us little guys feel important. <img src='http://www.foundationstech.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working Together To Solve Problems by Steve Noel</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/working-together-to-solve-problems#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=26#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Scott,
   Sounds like a good approach for you now. Are you planning on moving some of the task outsourcing to Autotask's ticket our sourcing when available? Also, have you built any LiveLinks from Autotask to Central Desktop? If so, please share them in the Autotask Community, I'm sure many would be interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
   Sounds like a good approach for you now. Are you planning on moving some of the task outsourcing to Autotask&#8217;s ticket our sourcing when available? Also, have you built any LiveLinks from Autotask to Central Desktop? If so, please share them in the Autotask Community, I&#8217;m sure many would be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working Together To Solve Problems by Scott Cover</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/working-together-to-solve-problems#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=26#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I also forgot to mention that Central Desktop has a built in Web Meeting function as well. Which is a nice little bonus I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also forgot to mention that Central Desktop has a built in Web Meeting function as well. Which is a nice little bonus I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quoting Your Work by Scott Cover</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/quoting-your-work#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=25#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Really after writing the post I realized that quoting wasn't really the right word.

Because a lot of the quips with my process stem more around the add-ons to the proposals than anything. The parts where I'm adding little one-page pieces that explain the features and benefits of what we are offering the client.

I've always known I'm my own worst critic, and have gotten compliments on my proposals in the past. Just always want it to be better, faster, prettier.

And those SET Consulting people, well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really after writing the post I realized that quoting wasn&#8217;t really the right word.</p>
<p>Because a lot of the quips with my process stem more around the add-ons to the proposals than anything. The parts where I&#8217;m adding little one-page pieces that explain the features and benefits of what we are offering the client.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always known I&#8217;m my own worst critic, and have gotten compliments on my proposals in the past. Just always want it to be better, faster, prettier.</p>
<p>And those SET Consulting people, well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quoting Your Work by Jared Goralnick</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/quoting-your-work#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=25#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Yeah, stay away from SET Consulting, they're prohibitively expensive and there's very little ROI.

Actually, we don't really do "quoting systems" so much but do automate proposals.  You could probably create a very simple database that exports to Excel, etc.  But I think all of that is missing the point.

My guess is that you don't need what you think you need--you should seriously consider what you think your clients are expecting and find a way to make that a little simpler to produce.  Getting exactly what you want might not be the best thing for you...but we can talk about that offline some day.

Just my $0.02...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, stay away from SET Consulting, they&#8217;re prohibitively expensive and there&#8217;s very little ROI.</p>
<p>Actually, we don&#8217;t really do &#8220;quoting systems&#8221; so much but do automate proposals.  You could probably create a very simple database that exports to Excel, etc.  But I think all of that is missing the point.</p>
<p>My guess is that you don&#8217;t need what you think you need&#8211;you should seriously consider what you think your clients are expecting and find a way to make that a little simpler to produce.  Getting exactly what you want might not be the best thing for you&#8230;but we can talk about that offline some day.</p>
<p>Just my $0.02&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Working Together To Solve Problems by Jared Goralnick</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/working-together-to-solve-problems#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=26#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott, Basecamp does have an integrated wiki, though I'll admit it's not exactly full featured.  At my company, we do use it and it does what we need out of a wiki. (It's called Writeboards to them)

Good luck with figuring out all the software pieces...you always make great decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott, Basecamp does have an integrated wiki, though I&#8217;ll admit it&#8217;s not exactly full featured.  At my company, we do use it and it does what we need out of a wiki. (It&#8217;s called Writeboards to them)</p>
<p>Good luck with figuring out all the software pieces&#8230;you always make great decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Name Change by Alexander Muse</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/business/the-name-change#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=22#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Sometimes it makes sense to resurrect an old brand.  There is an interesting article on this in the NYT:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/magazine/18rebranding-t.html?_r=1&#38;oref=slogin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it makes sense to resurrect an old brand.  There is an interesting article on this in the NYT:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/magazine/18rebranding-t.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/magazine/18rebranding-t.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Right Tool For The Job by Scott Cover</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/the-right-tool-for-the-job#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=20#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Frankly I'm not surprised that a lot of providers haven't heard of solutions like &lt;a href="http://www.autotask.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Autotask or &lt;a href="http://www.commitcrm.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;CommitCRM&lt;/a&gt;. When I went with &lt;a href="http://www.calyptix.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Calyptix&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href="http://www.smbnation.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;SMB Nation&lt;/a&gt; in NY this year, I can't tell you the number of people I talked to that are still running the integrated ISA firewall with SBS server.

It really surprised me that so many people are happy using what I would consider a inferior solution. But from what I could tell, it was mostly smaller shops staffed with old school techs that don't want to change their ways.

Maybe I just find it odd since I would be considered a Gen Y person, and am always looking for change and the next great thing. Frankly I can only hope all these companies will begin moving to MSP platforms or going out of business, because the customers deservce all the benefits that a quality MSP can provide.

-Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly I&#8217;m not surprised that a lot of providers haven&#8217;t heard of solutions like <a href="http://www.autotask.com" rel="nofollow">Autotask or </a><a href="http://www.commitcrm.com" rel="nofollow">CommitCRM</a>. When I went with <a href="http://www.calyptix.com" rel="nofollow">Calyptix</a> to <a href="http://www.smbnation.com" rel="nofollow">SMB Nation</a> in NY this year, I can&#8217;t tell you the number of people I talked to that are still running the integrated ISA firewall with SBS server.</p>
<p>It really surprised me that so many people are happy using what I would consider a inferior solution. But from what I could tell, it was mostly smaller shops staffed with old school techs that don&#8217;t want to change their ways.</p>
<p>Maybe I just find it odd since I would be considered a Gen Y person, and am always looking for change and the next great thing. Frankly I can only hope all these companies will begin moving to MSP platforms or going out of business, because the customers deservce all the benefits that a quality MSP can provide.</p>
<p>-Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Right Tool For The Job by Maayan Porat</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/the-right-tool-for-the-job#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Maayan Porat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=20#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

I have to agree with all that have been said. At CommitCRM we offer a CRM, PSA and Billing solution which was designed specifically for small to mid sized IT services businesses. 

We currently serve thousands of IT professionals, however, despite all of the efforts, many IT service providers are still not aware that solutions such as CommitCRM, or the other tools mentioned above, exist.

Maayan Porat
Commit Business Solutions
www.CommitCRM.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>I have to agree with all that have been said. At CommitCRM we offer a CRM, PSA and Billing solution which was designed specifically for small to mid sized IT services businesses. </p>
<p>We currently serve thousands of IT professionals, however, despite all of the efforts, many IT service providers are still not aware that solutions such as CommitCRM, or the other tools mentioned above, exist.</p>
<p>Maayan Porat<br />
Commit Business Solutions<br />
<a href="http://www.CommitCRM.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.CommitCRM.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Right Tool For The Job by Bob V.</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/the-right-tool-for-the-job#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=20#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hey, Scott --

We're also amazed at the number of IT solution providers who are still "in the dark" about solutions like Autotask, even though we've been marketing our brains out exclusively in this market, and this market only! We're at all the major trade shows like CompTIA, XChange, Ingram VTN, to name a few; we're a major sponsor of every IT service group we can find, including MSP Alliance, Ascii Group, ITA, MSP Partners, MSPSN, SMB Nation, and others; we attend lots of regional Microsoft SBSC groups; we're partnered with every major vendor that IT guys deal with, including Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, plus all of the MSP tool vendors; we advertise in the key trade magazines, like CRN, VAR Business, Business Solutions, etc.; we run webinars like every other week, and send e-mail reminders out to everyone who visits our web site and fills out a form (whew!)

Yet, despite all of this, our biggest competitors today is inertia and ignorance. I think there are about 100,000 companies out there doing some kind of outsourced technology services -- many of them with 5 or fewer employees. I guess they don't think they need a purpose-built solution to help them run their business, since the owners tend to BE the business. But, while we do sell our software to some fairly large companies with hundreds of employees, the vast majority of our customers are really small. And like you said, Scott, it takes them a long time to finally come around to realize that they can be a lot more efficient, provide a lot better customer service, get a lot more work done without increasing staff, and in the end, make a lot more money.

I'm glad you're still "ahead of the curve." But our user base is nor nearly 20,000 and growing fast. 

With that in mind, we are now working on the next generation of our software that will facilate collaboration -- allowing our users to co-manage system with their larger clients, to easily out-task tickets and projects to subcontractors, and to seamlessly integrate with service networks like OnForce and IMSN.

Thanks for being a great customer and spreading the word!

-- Bob V.

Bob Vogel
Chief Marketing Officer
Autotask Corporation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Scott &#8211;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re also amazed at the number of IT solution providers who are still &#8220;in the dark&#8221; about solutions like Autotask, even though we&#8217;ve been marketing our brains out exclusively in this market, and this market only! We&#8217;re at all the major trade shows like CompTIA, XChange, Ingram VTN, to name a few; we&#8217;re a major sponsor of every IT service group we can find, including MSP Alliance, Ascii Group, ITA, MSP Partners, MSPSN, SMB Nation, and others; we attend lots of regional Microsoft SBSC groups; we&#8217;re partnered with every major vendor that IT guys deal with, including Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, plus all of the MSP tool vendors; we advertise in the key trade magazines, like CRN, VAR Business, Business Solutions, etc.; we run webinars like every other week, and send e-mail reminders out to everyone who visits our web site and fills out a form (whew!)</p>
<p>Yet, despite all of this, our biggest competitors today is inertia and ignorance. I think there are about 100,000 companies out there doing some kind of outsourced technology services &#8212; many of them with 5 or fewer employees. I guess they don&#8217;t think they need a purpose-built solution to help them run their business, since the owners tend to BE the business. But, while we do sell our software to some fairly large companies with hundreds of employees, the vast majority of our customers are really small. And like you said, Scott, it takes them a long time to finally come around to realize that they can be a lot more efficient, provide a lot better customer service, get a lot more work done without increasing staff, and in the end, make a lot more money.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re still &#8220;ahead of the curve.&#8221; But our user base is nor nearly 20,000 and growing fast. </p>
<p>With that in mind, we are now working on the next generation of our software that will facilate collaboration &#8212; allowing our users to co-manage system with their larger clients, to easily out-task tickets and projects to subcontractors, and to seamlessly integrate with service networks like OnForce and IMSN.</p>
<p>Thanks for being a great customer and spreading the word!</p>
<p>&#8211; Bob V.</p>
<p>Bob Vogel<br />
Chief Marketing Officer<br />
Autotask Corporation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
