<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quoting Your Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/quoting-your-work/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/quoting-your-work</link>
	<description>Building And Supporting Quality Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Cover</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/quoting-your-work/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Cover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=25#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Really after writing the post I realized that quoting wasn&#039;t really the right word.

Because a lot of the quips with my process stem more around the add-ons to the proposals than anything. The parts where I&#039;m adding little one-page pieces that explain the features and benefits of what we are offering the client.

I&#039;ve always known I&#039;m my own worst critic, and have gotten compliments on my proposals in the past. Just always want it to be better, faster, prettier.

And those SET Consulting people, well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really after writing the post I realized that quoting wasn&#8217;t really the right word.</p>
<p>Because a lot of the quips with my process stem more around the add-ons to the proposals than anything. The parts where I&#8217;m adding little one-page pieces that explain the features and benefits of what we are offering the client.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always known I&#8217;m my own worst critic, and have gotten compliments on my proposals in the past. Just always want it to be better, faster, prettier.</p>
<p>And those SET Consulting people, well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Goralnick</title>
		<link>http://www.foundationstech.com/technology/quoting-your-work/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundationstech.com/?p=25#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Yeah, stay away from SET Consulting, they&#039;re prohibitively expensive and there&#039;s very little ROI.

Actually, we don&#039;t really do &quot;quoting systems&quot; so much but do automate proposals.  You could probably create a very simple database that exports to Excel, etc.  But I think all of that is missing the point.

My guess is that you don&#039;t need what you think you need--you should seriously consider what you think your clients are expecting and find a way to make that a little simpler to produce.  Getting exactly what you want might not be the best thing for you...but we can talk about that offline some day.

Just my $0.02...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, stay away from SET Consulting, they&#8217;re prohibitively expensive and there&#8217;s very little ROI.</p>
<p>Actually, we don&#8217;t really do &#8220;quoting systems&#8221; so much but do automate proposals.  You could probably create a very simple database that exports to Excel, etc.  But I think all of that is missing the point.</p>
<p>My guess is that you don&#8217;t need what you think you need&#8211;you should seriously consider what you think your clients are expecting and find a way to make that a little simpler to produce.  Getting exactly what you want might not be the best thing for you&#8230;but we can talk about that offline some day.</p>
<p>Just my $0.02&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
